What Went Wrong With James Gunn’s DC Reboot? 6 Missteps That Raise Bigger Questions

June 21, 2024, China: In this photo illustration, the American comic book publishing company DC Comics logo seen displayed on a smartphone with an economic stock exchange index graph in the background. China - ZUMAs197 20240621_aab_s197_235 Copyright: xBudrulxChukrutx
Ever since James Gunn and Peter Safran took the helm at DC Studios, expectations have been sky-high, and for good reason. The duo arrived with a plan, a slate of ambitious projects, and a fanbase desperate for stability after years of uneven results. When Superman landed to strong reviews, the dark days were declared over with confidence.
The costume was comic-accurate; the superhero did not have his mustache digitally removed, and there was no squinting required to see what was happening on the screen. It was in every sense a fresh start.
But is James Gunn’s DC reboot really all roses? Here are the thorns that stand out for fans.
Misstep 1: The Suicide Squad’s box office stumble
James Gunn’s first DC outing came before he and Peter Safran ever took charge of the studio, but it set an uneasy precedent. The Suicide Squad grossed a little over $168 million worldwide against a reported $185 million budget, a result that fell short of the mark. While some may consider it a cult classic, the numbers told a different story.

Credits: Imago
SUICIDE SQUAD
Now the film is back in the conversation. On the podcast The Suicide Squad: Is It Canon?, Gunn said Harley Quinn will almost certainly find her way into the DCU.
More importantly, he said he would bend over backwards to make Margot Robbie’s version fit, if she wants the role again.
Misstep 2: A new slate announced over unfinished business
Timing was never DC Studios’ strongest suit. James Gunn and Peter Safran unveiled their new slate while Shazam! Fury of the Gods, Blue Beetle, Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom, and other DCEU projects were still waiting in line for release. The result was a franchise left in limbo, with audiences unsure whether those films mattered or were already a closed chapter.

Credits: Imago
Henry Cavill and Amy Adams in a still from Zack Snyder's Man of Steel (2013)
Henry Cavill’s fans arguably took the news the hardest. The actor had only recently suited up again as Superman in Black Adam after an extended absence from DC, sparking hopes that the cape would stay on him. The new slate had other plans.
Misstep 3: Superman & Lois caught in the crossfire
Even a Superman could not outrun the politics at Warner Bros. Superman & Lois had earned a loyal following and steady ratings, yet its fourth season would be its last. According to CW president Brad Schwartz, the call came from Warner Bros., which did not want a competing Superman product in the marketplace once the new film arrived.

Nicholas Hoult and David Corenswet USA . Nicholas Hoult and David Corenswet in (C)Warner Bros new film: Superman (2025). Plot: Superman must reconcile his alien Kryptonian heritage with his human upbringing as reporter Clark Kent. As the embodiment of truth, justice and the human way he soon finds himself in a world that views these as old-fashioned. LMK106-J11145-010725 Supplied by LMKMEDIA. Editorial Only. Landmark Media is not the copyright owner of these Film or TV stills but provides a service only for recognised Media outlets.
For fans of Tyler Hoechlin and Elizabeth Tulloch, the logic stung. A show that had quietly kept the Man of Steel’s legacy alive was cleared away to make room for the big-screen version of the same hero.
Misstep 4: James Gunn's Superman could not break the box office ceiling
Strong reviews do not always translate into record-breaking receipts, and Superman is proof. The film earned about $618 million worldwide, a healthy sum by most standards but not enough to overtake Man of Steel’s roughly $668 million gross.

Credits: Imago
July 26, 2025, San Diego, California, USA: JAMES GUNN speaking at the 2025 San Diego Comic Con at the San Diego Convention Center in San Diego, California. San Diego USA - ZUMAg247 20250726_znp_g247_055
For a studio hoping to launch an entire universe on the back of its flagship hero, falling short of its predecessor stings. While the numbers may not have exceeded those of the earlier film, the new Superman did excel where the earlier one stumbled: in critical acclaim.
Misstep 5: Soft openings for the newest releases
The momentum behind the new DCU has not carried through its latest releases. Supergirl arrived in theaters this summer with a worldwide opening of roughly $68 million, well short of expectations, and wrapped its run at about $126 million against a reported budget of around $170 million.

Credit: DC Studios/Warner Bros. Pictures
Milly Alcock as SUPERGIRL in DC Studios’ and Warner Bros. Pictures’ “SUPERGIRL”, a Warner Bros. Pictures release.
Clayface followed with a worldwide opening of around $43 million, lower than Supergirl’s start. Two projects in quick succession opening below hopes make it harder to ignore the pattern, and they leave a nagging question of whether audiences are still buying into the wider universe.
Misstep 6: James Gunn's DC reboot needs a podcast to explain itself
When a studio has to host a podcast to explain its own continuity, the confusion has likely gone beyond a few passing questions. Between a rocky box office run, a slate announced over unfinished projects, and fan favorites left in limbo, doubt has steadily piled up around the DCU. James Gunn’s answer was to take the question to the fans directly, sitting down on a podcast titled, The Suicide Squad: Is It Canon?, with cast members to sort out what counts as canon and what doesn’t. It is a transparent move, but it also hints at a larger problem.
A universe built to feel cohesive should not need a guide to keep track of it, and the thorns raise bigger questions about where DC goes from here.
What do you think about James Gunn's DC Reboot? Let us know in the comments.
Edited By: Itti Mahajan




