What Is the Eugenics Allegation on Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle Ad, and How Is It Related to Calvin Klein?

American Eagle, once the cool kid of mall culture, has weathered everything from union boycotts to courtroom brawls with Abercrombie & Fitch. But nothing quite prepared it for the storm kicked up by its latest star-powered campaign. Enter Sydney Sweeney, clad in denim and wordplay, turning “great genes” into “great jeans.” What was meant as cheeky marketing quickly morphed into a lightning rod for debate, sparking think pieces and outrage threads alike, and now the American Eagle campaign is surrounded by the eugenics allegations.
Fans are curious to know how a pair of jeans ended up sparking a fiery debate about heredity, history, and human rights, welcome to the Sydney Sweeney eugenics ad storm.
The eugenics debate linking Sydney Sweeney’s ad to Calvin Klein’s history
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Eugenics, long dismissed as a racist and pseudo-scientific ideology, promotes the myth that certain people possess inherently superior genes worthy of preservation. Critics claim Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle “great genes” ad unintentionally mirrors such rhetoric, blending it into playful denim branding. Commentators note striking echoes of Calvin Klein’s 1980s Brooke Shields campaign, where she referenced genetic codes and evolutionary fitness. Both have been seen as weaving fashion imagery with themes uncomfortably close to a history of exclusionary and discriminatory narratives.

Building on these parallels and the growing criticism, Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle campaign channels the same bold spirit that made Brooke Shields’ Calvin Klein debut infamous. Both leveraged youth, allure, and controversy to dominate cultural conversation. While Shields embodied minimalism and mystery, Sweeney’s version leans on playful provocation. The shared impact lies not in identical slogans, but in their ability to spark headlines and ignite debates far beyond fashion. While the storm of criticism raged, American Eagle stepped in with a defense as bold as its campaign, aiming to shield both its name and Sweeney’s public image.
As the controversy and backlash swelled to a breaking point, American Eagle zipped the tension shut with a statement aimed at silencing the noise and stitching its image back together.
American Eagle speaks out in support of Sydney Sweeney
American Eagle took to Instagram to set the record straight. In a polished post, the brand declared that “Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans” celebrated style, not subtext. “Her jeans. Her story,” the caption read, blending brevity with empowerment. They insisted the focus was on fit, confidence, and perfect denim washes. The statement, delivered with corporate poise, turned the tide, as fans flooded the comments with praise, defending both Sweeney and the campaign’s intent.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The campaign stumbled into controversy draped in retro outrage, as critics fixated on the “great genes” pun, accusing it of romanticizing eugenic ideals and Eurocentric beauty with a blonde, blue-eyed star at its center. While Sydney Sweeney received supportive messages from loyal fans on X, trolls targeted not only her but even her pet dog. The online storm showed no signs of fading, with many drawing parallels to Calvin Klein’s past eugenics-linked advertising, underscoring how fashion’s history can still ignite today’s fiercest cultural debates.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
What do you think about the eugenics allegation on Sydney Sweeney’s ad campaign? Let us know in the comments below.
ADVERTISEMENT
Edited By: Hriddhi Maitra
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT



