“It’s Terrifying”: Theo James Opens Up About Raising a Son in Today’s Online World
Theo James operates with a kind of calibrated restraint that has become his signature, performances built on controlled release. In the Divergent films, he played Four as a man constantly negotiating power and vulnerability beneath a dystopian gaze. Years later, in The White Lotus, that same energy sharpened into something more corrosive: entitlement disguised as ease, masculinity performed as quiet dominance.
There is a different kind of script now, one not written in Hollywood but coded into algorithms and online echo chambers. And James, a father of two, is reading it closely.
Theo James shares raising sons in the age of the manosphere
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
What unsettles Theo James is a systemic trend. Speaking on the Josh Smith's Great Chat Show podcast, he did not hedge.
“It’s terrifying having a son because people get lured into this idea very easily.”
The “idea” in question is the manosphere, an ecosystem of digital spaces that flatten masculinity into performance, dominance, and spectacle. For James, raising a two-year-old boy with his wife Ruth Kearney means confronting that pipeline early, before it becomes identity. His diagnosis is pointed.
“Men who feel they need to be performative or misogynistic… it’s about them not feeling good enough essentially, but it’s hidden with meaningless bravado.”
The actor, who shares a four-year-old daughter and two-year-old son with Kearney, is not advocating for ideological extremes. For him it is about a base level of empathy and some semblance of morality, before undercutting the current cultural currency. Even body image, long coded as a female issue, is now, in his words, part of a male identity crisis fueled by steroids, aesthetics, and silent competition.

Netflix Cancels Millie Bobby Brown’s ‘Perfect’ Months After Announcement Over ‘Creative Differences'
If James is navigating fatherhood with caution, his career is moving in the opposite direction, toward speculation, scale, and legacy. Post-White Lotus, the industry chatter has shifted from “reliable leading man” to something more mythic: Bond.
The Bond question: myth, market, and momentum
When asked about the possibility of becoming the next Bond, on the Happy Sad Confused podcast in February 2025, Theo James deflected with dry humor.
“There is no narrative among my friends because they would say, ‘You? Are you joking?’” he said.
“You’d be the first Bond-opolis. The Greek Bond with hummus.” (James’s full name, Theodore Peter James Kinnaird Taptiklis, nods to his Greek heritage.)
Still, the speculation persists because the vacancy is real. Since Daniel Craig exited after No Time to Die, the next iteration of James Bond remains uncast. James sits comfortably in the shortlist, alongside names like Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Henry Cavill, each representing a different tonal direction for the franchise.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
What works in James’s favor is texture. He brings a layered masculinity, one that can oscillate between charm and critique, surface and subtext. In a post-Craig era where Bond must evolve beyond archetype, that nuance is strategic.
James, then, stands at an unusual intersection: a father interrogating modern masculinity at home, and an actor potentially poised to redefine it on screen.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
What do you think? Are concerns like Theo James’s about raising boys in today’s online culture valid? Share your take in the comments.
ADVERTISEMENT
Edited By: Hriddhi Maitra
More from Netflix Junkie on Hollywood News
ADVERTISEMENT










