In the ever-dramatic world of Tinseltown, celebrities frequently collide with politics, creating feuds that grip headlines for years. One of the most infamous remains the long-standing tension between Donald Trump and Taylor Swift. These public showdowns highlight how Hollywood and Washington often exist in a constant tug-of-war. Now, another bold name has entered the fray; James Gunn, the acclaimed filmmaker behind Guardians of the Galaxy and Superman. The question lingering now is not about box office but about a whopping $1 billion and court.

When discussions should have been about the grand billions that his movie is bringing in, the talk of the town is about taking the president to court.

In mid-July 2025, a viral rumor ignited when the White House shared an image showing Donald Trump as Superman, coinciding with the release of James Gunn’s new Superman film. Social media buzzed with claims that Gunn had slapped a staggering $1 billion lawsuit on Trump and the White House for unauthorized use of the superhero poster. Posts racked up hundreds of thousands of views and likes. Yet, despite the frenzy, this sensational story is completely false; no lawsuit has been filed.

An article from USAmidia fueled the rumor, asserting James Gunn had sued Donald Trump for copyright infringement over a political poster depicting Trump as Superman. The piece detailed alleged legal claims and damages to the iconic brand, even citing statements from Gunn’s legal team. However, major news outlets have found no evidence of this lawsuit, suggesting the entire story is a fabrication. With the legal drama proven false, the conversation quickly shifted, could Gunn’s Superman be making a political statement?

The Woke Superman Problem: When Did the Man of Steel Become a Man of Feelings?

With the blockbuster success of the film, questions are flying: has James Gunn used Superman to reflect the chaos of our real world, or is it all just clever fiction?

James Gunn firmly denies any intentional political messaging in his Superman film. Speaking to The Times, he clarified that the fictional Bovaria-Jarhanpur conflict has no connection to the Middle East. He revealed that the script was completed back in May 2023, well before the Gaza crisis intensified. According to Gunn, the storyline centers on a tyrannical regime exerting control over a weaker nation, an age-old narrative of power and oppression, not a veiled commentary on the Israel-Palestine situation.

The debate surrounding the film is as fierce as any epic Kryptonian showdown. Some critics argue the movie is heavily laced with anti-Israel undertones, making the political subtext unavoidable. Others quickly push back, dismissing such interpretations as overblown partisan spin. As Superman eclipses Man of Steel in both acclaim and cultural impact, James Gunn’s star continues to rise. Yet, just like the film itself avoids a political agenda, the swirling rumors of Gunn suing Donald Trump remain utterly baseless.

'Man of Steel' Writer David S. Goyer Showers Love for James Gunn’s ‘Optimistic’ 'Superman', Reveals the Reason Behind

What do you think about the rumors of a lawsuit between Donald Trump and James Gunn? Let us know in the comments below.