DC Reportedly Pitted James Gunn’s 'Supergirl' Cut Against Craig Gillespie’s Before Its Box Office Collapse

Published 07/03/2026, 7:39 PM CDT

Credit: DC Studios/Warner Bros. Pictures

The cape looked heavy long before anyone yelled, 'Action.' Warner Bros. and DC Studios loaded Supergirl with blockbuster expectations, backed by a reported $170 million budget and another $120 million for marketing. The reward was a $38 million domestic and $68 million global debut. Meanwhile, James Gunn and Craig Gillespie reportedly found themselves circling competing test cuts and stubborn creative disagreements, proving that capes are not the only things stretched thin.

With the box office still chasing its break-even target, the latest reports suggest the production had been trying to survive its own internal battles well before the opening weekend.

The creative face-off that shaped Supergirl

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

According to The Hollywood Reporter, the biggest battle surrounding Supergirl was not against Krem. It was over the movie itself. James Gunn and Craig Gillespie reportedly disagreed on the film's creative direction, leading DC Studios to commission a rival studio cut after early test screenings failed to impress. Even superheroes struggle when two captains steer the same ship.

“'They were not creatively aligned' is the polite way of describing things," one insider said while weighing on the situation By late 2025, both the studio and Gillespie reportedly knew the film was not landing as intended. Jeremy Slater joined the post-production effort, the climactic battle was reworked, music choices became another sticking point, and the edit slowly turned into its own superhero crossover.

The drama peaked when DC Studios staged a bake-off between Gillespie's version and its own. Gillespie's cut reportedly ran 11 minutes longer, featured more of Matthias Schoenaerts' Krem, and scored better for pacing, music, and the villain. He even preferred not to read Woman of Tomorrow as he wanted to create his own visual understanding of the film. Yet, the studio's version won by only two test-screening points, hardly the knockout victory anyone wanted, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

The film eventually reached theaters, but the internal campaign had already been fought. After months spent debating edits instead of celebrating them, Supergirl arrived looking like a compromise, wearing a cape, and even had fans divided over the DCU film. Sometimes the hardest landing happens before the opening weekend gross arrives.

Did 'Supergirl' Flop? Why Female-Led Superhero Movies Aren’t Working Anymore

If DC has one recurring superpower, it is behind-the-scenes drama, and Supergirl just joined Justice League in the club.

Why Supergirl is stirring Justice League memories

Supergirl is giving longtime DC fans an unmistakable case of Justice League déjà vu, and not because of the capes. Both productions reached the same crossroads: disappointing test screenings, executives losing confidence, and post-production turning into a rescue mission. When a studio starts cutting competing versions instead of trailers, the alarm bells are already ringing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The biggest difference lies in who held the scissors. During Justice League, Warner Bros. executives pushed Zack Snyder aside in favor of a studio-friendly overhaul. With Supergirl, filmmaker James Gunn reportedly found himself overriding fellow director Craig Gillespie to protect a unified DC vision. Different decision-makers, same editing-room battlefield, and unfortunately, remarkably similar box office consequences.

'Supergirl’s' Villain Problem: Was Krem Responsible for Supergirl’s Failure?

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Would you want to watch a Craig Gillespie version of Supergirl? Let us know in the comments!

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :

ADVERTISEMENT

Iffat Siddiqui

1094 articles

Iffat is an Entertainment Journalist at Netflix Junkie. A word wizard, she had the sorting hat smoke at the seams owing to her excellence in everything Hollywood and cinema until it finally declared that she belonged to the Royals, specifically Meghan Markle. Boasting over 300 articles (and counting), each one tastefully infused with the right mix of facts, wit, opinion, and essentially everything to make a perfect pop culture piece, she is the epitome of a trustworthy entertainment journalist.

Edited By: Itti Mahajan

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

EDITORS' PICK