‘Breaking Bad’ Creator Says He Won’t Use AI Unless Someone Holds a Shotgun to His Head: Internet Reacts

Published 11/11/2025, 11:07 AM EST

A celebrated force behind Breaking Bad, known for creating deeply human stories filled with flawed characters, moral choices, and raw emotion, has spoken out against the use of AI in showbiz. His offering, Better Call Saul, alongside the earlier-mentioned one, has set the gold standard for television offerings. As Hollywood grapples with the rise of artificial intelligence, his candid take has quickly set the internet buzzing.

Vince Gilligan, the creator of Breaking Bad, shared his strong views on artificial intelligence in a recent interview with Polygon, discussing his upcoming Apple TV series Pluribus. The acclaimed small-screen creator expressed his firm stance against AI tools like ChatGPT. Gilligan made his position clear, saying he has not used it as of yet, as no one has held a shotgun to his head and made him do it. "I will never use it. No offense to anyone who does," he further added. The comment has sparked a mixed reaction from cinephiles on X.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Notably, Vince Gilligan is not the only Hollywood creator standing against the rise of artificial intelligence. Filmmaker Guillermo del Toro has made it clear he wants nothing to do with AI, saying he has no interest in using such technology in his work and intends to stay that way for the rest of his life. Likewise, acclaimed actress and writer Emma Thompson has voiced her annoyance with AI tools that try to alter her scripts, describing them as a constant and unwelcome interference. Gilligan’s thoughts, however, are the current topic of interest online.

What Is ‘Parish’ on Netflix? ‘Breaking Bad’s’ Giancarlo Esposito & Team Are Back in a Underrated Show

From claims that Vince Gilligan will eventually embrace AI to praise for his commitment to keeping Hollywood human, the discourse on X covered it all.

X debates as Vince Gilligan rejects AI creativity tools

Reactions on X to Vince Gilligan’s anti-AI remarks ranged from skepticism to admiration. While some predicted that Gilligan would eventually come around to incorporating AI in his work, comparing its inevitability to "air," present everywhere and inescapable, others urged fellow creators to heed his message, emphasizing that true artistry demands heart, soul, and time. A few highlighted his pride in crafting scripts himself, praising his dedication to authenticity. Notably, fans also pointed out Pluribus’s credit line proudly declaring, "This show was made by humans," reinforcing Gilligan’s stand.

Vince Gilligan’s fans, meanwhile, also challenged a part of his comment to Polygon, where he said he meant no offense to those using AI. They argued that anyone relying on such tools should, in fact, take offense.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Vince Gilligan’s staunch rejection of AI clearly underscores a larger debate in Hollywood about the balance between technology and human creativity. As filmmakers, writers, and performers grapple with new tools, his insistence on authenticity reminds audiences that storytelling is as much about heart as it is about craft. Yet, with the entertainment world already experimenting with an AI actress, only time will tell where this evolving landscape ultimately stands, and whether the soul of storytelling can coexist with artificial innovation.

Is ‘Pluribus’ Based on Real Life? Everything to Know About the Wicked Inspirations for ‘Breaking Bad’ Creator’s New Show

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What do you think of Vince Gilligan’s statement? Let us know in the comments.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :

ADVERTISEMENT

Seema Sinha

581 articles

Seema Sinha is a journalist at Netflix Junkie, covering the celebrity culture and global cinema beats. With three years of experience at major Hollywood media verticals, she filters real news from the gossip and buzz. Her core focus is on pop culture narratives surrounding musicians—primarily Taylor Swift—with her reporting striking a fine balance between human insight and editorial clarity.

Edited By: Hriddhi Maitra

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

EDITORS' PICK